Division/Business Unit PMO
Plan what you can deliver. Deliver what you planned.
Planview is the platform for portfolio execution and outcomes. It sits above the tools your teams run on, bringing every project, request, and capacity commitment into one connected model. So the PMO can commit to dates the team can hit, cut the manual roll-ups that eat delivery time, and keep every promise.
Watch Demo Keep the promise. See how.Trusted by 3,000+ of the world’s leading enterprises
The PMO has a promise problem
The PMO makes promises every week. Dates to the business. Capacity to the teams. Status to the division leader above and the EPMO across. Then commits slip, capacity overbooks, and every review opens with the same caveat: the numbers don’t match. Demand outruns capacity, and the team built to deliver is half-consumed pulling status reports leadership already doubts.
The Planview Platform was built to fix this. It sits above the project, agile, and work management tools where the work happens, connecting that execution to one live model your division can trust. So the PMO walks into the next review with capacity defended, status that holds up, and the value story told.
Plan to capacity. Deliver on commitment. Promise kept.
Témoignages clients
How three PMO leaders moved from defending the numbers to delivering against them
200+ projects
across six divisions and an AUD $100M portfolio consolidated onto one PMO model in 12 weeks, with three legacy tools retired in the process.
“We have changed the role of the PMO from a data collection and visualization department into a much more useful, detail- and data-focused group.”
Director of Program & Portfolio Management, Horizon Power
Read Customer StoryEight signs you have a promise problem
-
1
Your team commits to delivery dates and leadership commits to outcomes, but no system connects the two.
-
2
Capacity gets debated every cycle because the data lives across tools, none of them current.
-
3
The division leader asks for status and your team spends days assembling it.
-
4
Project intake says yes more than capacity allows, and the slip surfaces well into the cycle.
-
5
Prioritization debates run on opinion because nobody trusts the scoring model.
-
6
Cross-project dependencies surface in the missed milestone, not the planning review.
-
7
Your PMO is producing status more than it’s improving delivery.
-
8
The question of what the PMO delivered this quarter is harder to answer than it should be.
A PMO that keeps its promises becomes the one leadership trusts to run delivery. The on-demand demo shows what consistent commit-to-deliver looks like.
Un leadership démontré de longue date
The analysts who advise your board name us a Leader, year after year
Plus de 3 000
des clients dans le monde entier
3.1M
utilisateurs de la plateforme Planview
45%
de la société fiduciaire Fortune 100 Planview
Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in its research publications and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors with the highest ratings or other designation. Gartner research publications consist of the opinions of Gartner’s Research & Advisory organization and should not be construed as statements of fact. Gartner disclaims all warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this research, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. GARTNER is a registered trademark and service mark of Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates in the U.S. and internationally, and MAGIC QUADRANT is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates and are used herein with permission. All rights reserved.
Examens par les pairs
DÉMO À LA DEMANDE
Watch what planning to real capacity looks like
See how Planview connects demand, capacity, and project status in one live model — so the PMO can make commitments the team can hit and keep every promise to the business.
Voir la démo
How Planview helps
Your Challenge
- Commits without capacity
- Status without action
- Prioritization without rigor
- Intake without discipline
- AI without authority
- Output without proof
Le problème
Teams commit to dates and scope against capacity nobody can see in real time, so overcommitment surfaces in the slip.
What it costs you
- Missed dates that scale with how late the conflict is caught.
- Burnout on teams the PMO is supposed to protect.
- Funding harder to defend each cycle.
How Planview delivers
- Capacity and resource management: See live capacity, demand, and skills across the team — not in spreadsheets.
- Scenario modeling: Test reallocation before committing to it.
- Capacity-aware intake: Flag over-subscription before approval, not after.
Resources for PMO leaders: research, reports, webinars and guides
E-book
Gestion PPM moderne : le guide de l'initié
Solution Brief
Planview Anvi™ for Portfolio Management
E-book
Quand le PMO devient un partenaire stratégique multifacette
E-book
Construire un portefeuille à fort impact : Un framework 5- étape par étape pour l'établissement de priorités stratégiques
E-book
Plan Smarter: A Leader’s Guide to Strategic Portfolio Planning
Rapport comparatif
État des lieux de l'exécution stratégique : entre vitesse, adaptation et contrôle
Envie de voir Planview en action ?
Explorez les démonstrations à la demande pour découvrir comment Planview vous aide à prendre des décisions plus rapidement, à exécuter comme un seul homme et à prouver les résultats.
Parcourir toutes les démos
Prêt à aller plus loin ?
Dites-nous où se situent vos décisions en matière de portefeuille. Nous vous montrerons exactement où se situe Planview et ce qu'il apporte généralement aux organisations de votre taille.
Contactez-nousExplore the Planview Platform
The right solution for every type of portfolio
Gestion de portefeuilles de projets
Centralize project intake, capacity, and execution under one model, and give the PMO the visibility to commit, deliver, and prove value every cycle.
Gestion stratégique de portefeuilles
Connect strategy, investment, capacity, and outcomes across the enterprise, and prove what every bet delivered at the portfolio level.
Développement de nouveaux produits
Prioritize the right R&D bets, coordinate engineering, supply, and regulatory on one plan, and get the right products to market faster.
Questions fréquentes
PMOs plan work against capacity by connecting project demand, resource availability, and in-flight work in one live model, so every commitment is checked against real capacity before it is made. Scenario modeling tests the impact of new work on the team before plans are set, rather than after delivery starts.
Most PMOs plan on the funding-cycle calendar instead of the capacity calendar, so overcommitment only surfaces once delivery slips. Planview connects project intake, capacity, and execution in one live model, so the PMO sees where the team is already committed and validates dates against real capacity before they reach the business. Scenario modeling shows what saying yes to one more program does to the team before the commitment is made.
PMOs commit with more confidence when delivery, demand, and capacity data live in one connected model, so dates are validated against what the team can actually deliver before they are promised. Confidence comes from seeing real capacity and dependencies up front, not from discovering constraints after delivery has started.
When commitment data is scattered across tools, the PMO commits on optimism and finds out too late. Planview brings delivery, demand, and capacity into one live model, so the PMO surfaces the dependencies and capacity limits that break dates early enough to adjust the plan instead of explaining the slip. Commit dates are validated against real capacity before they go to the business.
PMOs prioritize across competing demands by scoring every project against strategic value, financial return, capacity, and risk in one transparent framework, so the highest-value work is funded instead of the loudest request. What-if analysis quantifies the trade-off of each option before the decision is made.
Without a shared scoring model, prioritization runs on opinion and the loudest voice wins. Planview scores and ranks projects against strategic value, financial return, capacity, and risk using a transparent framework with a full audit trail, so the debate opens with data and every project ties back to the strategic outcome it advances. What-if scenarios quantify the cost of saying yes to one more program before the call is made.
The best way to manage divisional intake is to route every request through one governed front door, where it is scored against strategic value and checked against available capacity before approval. This prevents overcommitment by catching it at intake, when the team still has the option to say no.
When intake is informal, work enters the portfolio faster than the division can deliver it, and the overcommitment only shows up once dates slip. Planview centralizes intake, capacity, and execution in one model, so every request is scored against strategic value and checked against available capacity before it is approved. The PMO works one prioritized queue and has a defensible basis for every yes and no.
AI supports the PMO when it operates under governance — authority boundaries, budget ceilings, role definitions, and an audit trail — so agents can draft reports, score intake, and forecast risk without making ungoverned decisions. Purpose-built PMO agents absorb the manual work; humans keep judgment, stakeholder context, and prioritization calls.
Gartner forecasts that 40% of enterprise applications will use task-specific AI agents by the end of 2026, which makes governed, role-based AI the safe way to put agents to work. Planview’s agent resource management employs AI agents the same way the PMO employs people, with authority boundaries, budget ceilings, role definitions, and an audit trail: the PM Agent assembles the status roll-up from live work data, the Backlog Agent scores definition-of-ready, and the Forecasting Agent flags delivery confidence and risk. Humans keep judgment, stakeholder context, and the prioritization decisions that can’t be automated.





























